Vave Curaçao · OGL/2024/1676/0905
The only record here where licence, status, company and cashier were all read on the same day.
Volume—one of the three figures is missing, so the sum cannot be done
12 records 7 cashiers read 0 payouts timed
Register · updated 25 September 2026
Twelve crypto cashiers, ordered by a single measure: how much of the small print is written down as a number before anybody deposits. Not by looks, not by the size of the bonus poster, and not by an evening nobody here actually spent.
The figures are counted off the records and can be recounted: the list holds 12 records, 7 point at the exact clause and 7 cashiers were opened from here. Zero payout times measured is not a hole in the table but a hole in the measuring — the method says why.
Every record on this site carries a number out of 100. It is not a rating of the casino and it is not a recommendation. It counts one thing: how many of the facts that decide whether you get your money back are written down as a figure, in public, before you put anything in. A casino can be perfectly good and score 42 here. That means it publishes little, not that it plays badly.
The reason for measuring that rather than something more exciting is simple. Everything else a list of this kind normally claims to measure — payout speed, support quality, how it feels to play — either cannot be checked from outside or was never checked at all by the person writing it. What can be checked from outside is what is written: a licence number that either appears in a regulator's register or does not, a verification clause that either names a threshold or does not, a bonus that either states its multiplier and its base or leaves you to find out afterwards.
Four blocks of twenty-five. Licence, verification, bonus, cashier. The weights inside each block are deliberately uneven: a licence number that can be confirmed in the regulator's own register carries more than an extra coin in the cashier, because it is the only field on the whole card that can be checked somewhere other than the operator's own website. The method page lists every weight and the reason for it.
Here are the first six, with the same four bars as everywhere else on the site. The bar is the score in that block, drawn at its own scale — nothing is normalised behind the scenes to make a 10 look like an 18.
The only record here where licence, status, company and cashier were all read on the same day.
Volume—one of the three figures is missing, so the sum cannot be done
The same rule written into two separate sections, and the multiplier applied to the more expensive base.
Volume€14,000to clear the bonus on a €100 deposit
Its own coin in the cashier, and a multiplier that looks low until you read what it applies to.
Volume€7,000to clear the bonus on a €100 deposit
Fifteen coins — the widest cashier in this register, three of them stable.
Volume€4,000to clear the bonus on a €100 deposit
Ten coins in the cashier, two of which barely appear in any other record here.
Volume—one of the three figures is missing, so the sum cannot be done
The clause names bitcoin players outright — it is rarely written that plainly.
Volume—one of the three figures is missing, so the sum cannot be done
The other 6 are on the full list, with the same fields and the same gaps.
Read across the figure rather than down it. The long bars belong to operators that write things down, and the short ones to operators that do not. Vave sits at the top with 88 because its licence number, its status, its holding company and its cashier were all read on the same day. JacksClub sits at the bottom with 35 because the register entry exists and is legible, and that is where what could be read ran out.
A welcome bonus is advertised as a percentage, and the percentage is the least useful number in the offer. What decides whether the credit is worth taking is the wagering requirement: the multiplier, and what the multiplier applies to. Those two together turn a headline into a figure you can actually compare.
The sum needs three published numbers — percentage, multiplier, and the base the multiplier is applied to — and only 3 of the 12 records publish all three. Where one is missing the field stays blank, because guessing a multiplier is the same as inventing one.
| Record | Headline | What it applies to | Turnover on €100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbet | 250% | deposit + bonus | €14,000 |
| Shuffle | 100% | deposit + bonus | €7,000 |
| Rakebit | 100% | the bonus alone | €4,000 |
Two offers with the same headline percentage can differ by thousands of euros in stakes, and the difference is the base — not the percentage. The bonus page works one of them through line by line.
Every operator here reserves the right to ask for documents. That is not a distinguishing feature and it is not a complaint. What distinguishes them is whether the terms say when — at a named amount, at a named point in the process — or leave it at the operator's discretion with no threshold written anywhere.
A clause with a figure in it is the only part of the whole card you can plan around. Everything else tells you what may happen; a threshold tells you when.
| Record | Where the clause sits | Does it name a figure? |
|---|---|---|
| Vave | Section 8.7 | yes |
| Rainbet | Section 5.2 and 8.3 | no |
| Shuffle | Section 4.1 | no |
| Rakebit | no section given | no |
| DuckDice | Section section 2 | no |
| Wild Fortune | Section 18.1 | no |
| Metaspins | Section 12.5 | no |
| Bitcasino.io | Section 6.6 | yes |
| BitStarz | no section given | no |
| Chipstars | no section given | yes |
| LeeBet | no section given | yes |
| JacksClub | no section given | no |
Three records write a threshold as an actual amount, and they are worth reading closely because the amounts are not comparable with one another. One counts deposits added together, one counts the withdrawal being requested, and one splits the check into three steps with a different figure at each. Same word, three different rules.
A euro sitting in a Portuguese bank account passes through four separate hands before it becomes a balance in a crypto cashier, and the casino controls only the last one. The bank decides whether the transfer leaves and what it charges. The exchange sets the rate and the spread. The network confirms, at a fee that moves with traffic and has nothing to do with any casino.
This is the reason there is no «withdrawal time» column anywhere on this site. A number like that would be describing four things at once and attributing all of them to the one party whose terms you can actually read. The verification clause, by contrast, belongs to the casino alone and is written down, so that is what gets measured.
7 of the 12 cashiers were opened from here and the coin list read off the deposit screen. 18 distinct coins came out of that. The remaining cashiers are marked unopened, which is not the same as saying they are narrow — it means nobody looked.
The single most useful thing in a coin list is whether it holds a stable coin. Everything else in the cashier can be converted; a stable coin is the only one where the balance you deposited on Monday is still the balance on Friday. The coins page counts which cashiers have one.
BC.Game is excluded from the index rather than scored low in it. Its entry in the undefined register reads «undefined», and a revoked licence is not a missing field — it is a different kind of fact altogether. Giving it a number would put it on the same scale as the others, and it is not on that scale.
It is named rather than quietly dropped because a list that silently omits things cannot be checked. Anyone who wants to confirm this can look the entry up in the same register it came from.
Under the bars there is a single line labelled Volume. That is the turnover figure — what would have to be staked to clear the bonus on a €100 deposit. Where it shows a dash, one of the three numbers the sum needs was never published.
Carry on through the register